I have had a weakness for cameras from the time I started using a compact camera, manufactured by Kodak in 1983, while Anna and I lived in Chennai with our two children. The first camera had no adjustments possible except shoot after putting a 35 mm colour film. It costed three times the monthly salary I was getting. It gave good pictures although deficient in many ways according to modern photographic standards. It did serve our purpose as we could click many photos of children and family occasions.
The inspiration to take photos to have a documentation of the developmental progress of children with special needs came from two outstanding consultants whom I got to know during the time in London. One was professor David Morley, who had established an organisation, TALC to distribute teaching slides on several topics on the development of children. His was an outstanding example of using simple technology of good photography to disseminate scientific information on different child development topics. The other person was Dr Janet Goodall, who carried a compact camera and took pictures to illustrate different aspects of children's growth and development. She was a popular teacher and conference speaker who used her photos to illustrate and make her lectures visually impressive. In a recent letter from her, she was enquiring if I was still into photography!
It was because of the long wait to get it repaired, I was compelled to buy the Fourth camera, a Pentax, which had a similar zoom like the Nikon, but the picture quality was superior. Its flash was more powerful which improved the indoor shooting. By then it was late seventies, and the 35 mm Single Lens Reflex camera had appeared in the Indian market. However it was prohibitively costlier. The only places where I saw the SLR cameras was in the studios and with professional photographers. I fell for it because of the improved sharpness and colour blending which these cameras offered. I remember using the Pentax for about three years without any trouble. Then its flash failed and soon its motor that moved the film also failed. A photographer who heard my story of not being able to use a compact camera for more than three years, told me that they were meant for only limited use. I used to take about 100 pictures of children sometimes on a single day!
I recall not having had a camera for more than six months following the breakdown of the Pentax. There were occasions, I felt little lost without a camera. I remember longing for a SLR camera, although it was not financially affordable to buy one at that time. It was one the few occasions when, I felt rather helpless! It is good to have had such instances in life because one learns patience and grows in appreciation of all the 'things' one already has!
Anna and I were visiting friends in London that summer on our way to Rasa to attend the Life Revision Seminar. Ms Ann Yardely, whom we met was keen to bring a gift for ASHIRVAD when she would visit us in Chennai later that year. Because she was insistent, we mentioned to her about our desire to have a SLR camera to document children and their stories. That is how we got our fifth camera, a SLR shown below, which served us well for about five years. The slides and prints we made from this camera were of high quality that when I presented pictures of children in professional meetings in India and overseas, I felt that it met with the expectations of the minimum quality! I had not realised how a SLR camera can give better results than the compact cameras available at that time.
But the technology of the compact camera had changed by the mid eighties and the overseas manufacturing companies had established their sales and service outlets in many cities in India. The discomfort I had with the SLR camera was its visibly large size, which sometimes made children move towards the camera to touch and feel it making it difficult to click pictures.
It was this which prompted me to go back to a compact camera, the sixth camera, Powershot G2. It provided image stabilisation, optical zoom, macro facility and was digital with 4 megapixel configuration. It was a decent camera to begin the transition into the digital era. The image quality was excellent that I could blow up photos to a A4 size with excellent visual impact. It was small enough to carry around and could hide in the palm while engaging children and sue it without children being inquisitive to explore the camera. I think my interest in photography grew in to another level with this camera. I carried the camera with me during my travels and outings and which gave me an opportunity to learn to click without the earlier desperation to take photos with films with proper focus. I remember being helped by a professional photographer, Mr Rajan of Chandrika Studio, Chennai, prompting me to learn something about editing the photographs before getting them printed.
One major concurrent advancement in technology at that time was the access to computer to down loading pictures from the camera to make power points for presentations, which replaced the laborious process of making slides and using slide projectors to present at meetings. I feel grateful for this breakthrough in technology which became affordable and convenient. This camera is still functional even after regular use for five years. It was built to last. It had an alloy body and an excellent flash for indoor photography. I had to replace the battery two times during that time. I still like the camera. I would have liked to use it even now if its battery was available.
It was while using this camera, I began to be conscious of looking for a suitable background when a photo was clicked. I made further progress in learning about the direction of light and shadows in order to bring the best in every shot. It became easier because during the replay one gets an idea of the quality of the picture shot and choose to take another one if necessary. This gradual improvement in the quality of pictures shot, made me a camera enthusiast. That is how I started collecting books on camera and photography. I often picked up a magazine while travelling, to read and stay abreast with the progress in camera technology! The quick transition from a few megapixels to ten megapixels took place in less than ten years.
It was a desire to buy a camera with ten megapixels which led me to buy the seventh camera, Canon power shot SXI IS, which was advanced in its pixels, focussing, image stabilisation, almost bordering to the picture quality a digital SLR at 35 mms. It had also video recording facility which added to its versatile use while working with children. It provided an opportunity to record the syllables or words children would begin to use, when they had developmental needs. This made possible a serial recording of their speech and to keep them in the computer for comparison and further assessment. It was not as sturdy as the earlier power shot camera I had. Its battery life was short, which meant having three batteries, two as standbys while working with children. Its picture quality was less than average. There were better cameras, manufactured by Olympus and Fuji, but I stayed with Canon as the service support was far better for Canon camera. I got tired while using the camera and was keen to replace it. It happened in two years time.
That was the background to buy the
eight camera, Canon G1X, shown below, which to me was the best of the digital compact cameras I have had. Its 2.8-5.5 focal length lens with zoom and macro functions gave me excellent results. The picture quality was better because it had a 15 megapixel resolution. Its video recording was of high quality and did not carry the extraneous sounds during the recording. It captured pictures retaining the original colours. It had a multimode focussing, automatic and manual and had other adjustments like what one would find in a digital SLR camera. It had a built in flash as well as an option for an external flash, which made night photography easier. The programme in the menu covered a wide range of options that the pictures taken by this camera had an added visual appeal. Th power point slides even when magnified to the size of a normal screen did not show any granularity. When its zoom failed, I still could take photos while engaging children in small rooms. As I had bought the camera from England, the service provider in India refused to repair it as it was already superseded by high end other compact cameras and the spares were not available in India.
The shift to the digital SLR, the ninth camera took place following the disappointment with the compact camera. Also the digital cameras were in the market for a while and there was a proven credibility for its sturdiness and durability. The prize had dropped a bit and the lens quality was rated high. Friends advised me to shift to Nikon, as its digital SLR cameras were rated high. I felt drawn toward the canon range and chose a 5D camera with its native lens. It is a camera that I have had now for ten years in good working condition and needs very little attention. Although the lens gets mouldy, it does not necessarily affect the quality of pictures. The additional lenses- Macro, telezoom and prime lenses have served me well. It is heavy and I found it difficult to carry and shoot without a tripod during the last five years. I was able to use this camera for a wide range of photography. In fact I developed an interest in taking photos of birds since I had this camera.
So when the mirrorless camera came into the market, I switched to it to see if that can be a suitable alternative, as it was lighter and still gave fairly sharp pictures.
I felt awkward to carry a bulky 5D Canon camera around for two reasons- it was a sought after camera until recently and used by professional photographers. Secondly, it makes others think that I am a serious photographer. So when there are professional photographers in a meeting, wedding or special occasions, they tend to think that I too am a professional photographer. The professional photographers have an affinity for their tribe and I got some benefits from them, offering me vantage positions to take photos. I had not realised till recently that owning a D5 SLR camera enhanced the image of a photographer.
The
tenth camera was a Canon M series camera with 21 megapixels, which is my regular camera accompanying me during my travels. It is light in weight and its lenses are equally light. I found it easy to carry around it in the shoulder bag. It is also unobtrusive unlike the 5D digital SLR. However it has disappointed me in its sharpness and zoom functions. The quality of pictures taken with its zoom function is below average. Th convenience of its light weight and easy to carry around, cannot be a good compensation for the poor quality of pictures. I did not go for another mirrorless camera, although Olympus, Fiji, and Sony market better ones, as I got interested in Micro Four thirds camera during this time.
This is the
eleventh camera, which I acquired in 2017, a Micro Four Third camera manufactured by Panasonic. It is lighter than a digital SLR. Its lenses are manufactured by Leica and therefore has some class about them. Although it is not a full frame camera, it is good enough as the picture and video quality are comparable to those of a digital SLR. It has a dust and whether protected ally body and all its adjustments and modes are easy to use. It has a menu that is user friendly. I have used this sparingly as I usually carry the mirrorless Canon camera with me. Now that I have got little more used to the Panasonic and the picture quality has really charmed me, I feel inclined to keep this as my first camera for regular use. The prime lenses are of outstanding quality. I cannot say the same about the zoom lens. As it is Micro Four Thirds in its design of the sensor, it cannot match a full frame camera. But it has already become popular because of other advantages. The cameras of this family are also marketed by Fuji, Sony, Olympus, etc. Sony and Fuji seem to bring out something special in their camera. The Olympus and Panasonic lenses are interchangeable.
I have been particularly impressed by the Leica lens, 200 mm of focal length of 2.8 used in the G5H Panasonic camera. It gives a zoom range upto 600 mm with an adapter the company provides. Having used this prime lens, I realise how easy it is to carry it around unlike a similar prime lens manufactured by Nikon or Canon or Sigma.
There are questions whether the Micro Four Third technology would get marginalised with the advent of the mirrorless SLR cameras marketed by Nikon and Canon during the last few months. The recent announcement by Fuji, who is a leader in the Micro Four Third technology, that they would not go into mirrorless SLR design and Olympus confining themselves to this technology, it is likely that it has come to stay. The Canon and Nikon lenses which offer a wide range currently for the digital SLR cameras would be used in the mirrorless SLR with the help of converters. The native lenses designed for mirrorless SLRs might be better in quality and lighter in weight. It might take a while for these lenses to be available, although cameras would be available soon.
What is yet another challenge is the megapixel range the mirrorless cameras might offer, 40 or more, which would need better cards to capture photos and higher storage capacity in the computer. The wireless connectivity for photo transmission might be available but if the transmission is slow, it can be be pain. So, I have become a convinced advocate for using cameras with Micro Four Third technology. Even professional photographers have made the switch!
As I summarise my own journey into the arena of photography, spread over thirty five years I am aware that most of my experience are confined to taking pictures of children, flowers, birds, and landscapes. As physics of light and technological adaptations are still far too high for me to comprehend, I have been utilitarian in my approach to photographs. I had a need of some photographs and I seem to manage to take them! I am not even sure if the quality matches the standards needed of amateur photographers.
I have been writing a photoblog from 2012:
waymarksofajourney.blogspot.co
It is here I use most of my photographs. I have exhibited some of my photographs. I take time to meditate on the photos, which to me has been a growing experience in understanding myself, others and the environment!
The important gain I have had from photography is an incremental awareness about realities beyond what is obvious and visible.
It is one way of making the interior of my life richer by the different story line which start from the photographs.
For me photography is not just a hobby, but a journey into the lives of people, families, circumstances, nature, special occasions and the micro world. I would have missed the sights of small creatures in the garden but for the photographs that revealed them to me.
I have friends who are regular with photo-shoot outings. Dr Sanjeeth Peter, a cardio-thoracic surgeon is one of them. His photographs are of 'National Geography' standard. He sends a picture calendar every month and the photos in them bring a new world of content and quality. Sanjeeth is my favourite photographer friend with whom I have several conversations on birds, nature, animals, etc.
I do not have a similar passion. I wait for a sight to invite me to capture my attention. Somethings happens within me when I take a photo that has touched me! That is what makes me stay interested in photography!
M.C.Mathew(text and photo)
